Could methanol be the feasible path toward replacing petroleum-based fuels?
Balancing dependence on Middle East oil against increasing fuel demand continues to challenge China in its ongoing urbanization and industrialization. In an effort to adapt to such limitations, China has increased production capacity and consumption of methanol. In less than a decade, methanol use in China’s transportation sector grew from virtually zero to replacing nearly 8% of the country’s gasoline requirement.
China’s approach may prove to be profitable and strategic. Research suggests that methanol fits within existing energy infrastructure, offers a convenient solution for efficient energy storage and most importantly, certain methanol fuel blends can be used in today’s internal-combustion engines. Demand in Asia is rising as methanol is increasingly used as more than a chemical feedstock.
“Methanol is seen as a strategic fuel by the rapidly growing nation due to its clean fuel benefits, favorable economics, the ease of adopting methanol in current fueling infrastructure and the advantage of being able to use alternative feedstocks in a nation that is lacking in domestic oil reserves,” said former Deputy Governor of Shanxi Province, Peng Zhi Gui.
In 1995, the first methanol pilot project in China was initiated by Sino-American Scientific Collaboration. Ford Motor Co. donated a methanol engine and assisted in developing the first methanol automobile in China. Direct blending with gasoline drives the recent growth in methanol demand. In 2009, national fuel blending standards for M85 and M100 went into effect across China, and a national M15 standard is currently in the final stages of adoption. These standards, along with the domestic availability of methanol and its lower cost compared to gasoline, will increase methanol’s fuel market share. In addition, methanol-blended fuel could be 50% cheaper than regular gas for drivers at the pump, depending on blend.
In 2010, China’s methanol production capacity reached 38.4 million tons and will increase to 50 million tons by 2015. The M15 blended fuel is already widely used in five provinces – Shanxi, Shaanxi, Zhejiang, Guizhou and Heilongjiang, with localized standards implemented by provincial governments.
Methanol is the simplest alcohol, with the lowest carbon content and highest hydrogen content of any liquid fuel. As such, it offers a substantial improvement in toxic emissions, eliminating extremely harmful aromatics like benzene and xylene, and the particulate matter present in gasoline and diesel fuel.
China also plans to invest $382 billion in innovative energy conservation and anti-pollution projects over the next four years. Methanol is biodegradable in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions posing little long-term threat to ecosystems because it is unlikely to accumulate in the environment.
China is edging ahead by actively restructuring the contours of the system, placing a focus on the real problem (oil), and diversifying the transportation fuel market. The country has set a target of producing and selling 500,000 energy-efficient and alternative-energy vehicles a year by 2015, and five million vehicles a year by 2020. Improved methanol production capacities would provide China with a handy alternative to petroleum-based fuels and chemicals in a post-peak-oil scenario, or as an emergency reserve in a temporary oil crisis.
It is a concern that China primarily derives its methanol from coal. As a transportation fuel, coal-based methanol has a larger carbon footprint than gasoline and could trigger higher world coal prices. Natural-gas-based methanol is also an alternative to petroleum-based products. Outside of China, methanol is primarily made from natural gas. In the United States, increased supply of shale gas and other unconventional sources is expected to keep gas prices relatively low.
California promoted methanol as an automotive fuel in the 1980s and ‘90s. In fact in the early ’90s, methanol was a more accepted automotive fuel than ethanol in the U.S. and the U.S. even helped initiate methanol fuel programs in China. Very little data is available on how and why methanol policy and programs ended in the United States.
No matter one’s individual perspective — liberal or conservative — we need a concrete solution that encourages competition and innovation, ensuring Americans an affordable and stable supply of replacement fuels for our transportation needs. Methanol can be derived from many plentiful energy resources and give the oil fuels a real run for their money.
+


China using MeOH in gasoline to rise
Zana,
You’ve written a wonderful article and are really close here to hitting the nail squarely upon its head. China’s coal to methanol and then direct methanol blending into gasoline is NOT known to many Americans. There has been very little information on the net about this recent phenomenon. Just like the real reasons that M-85 died in CA are not well known.
Your article seemed to indicate the MeOH use in CA was more widespread than it was. The first FFV chips in use in this country were M-85 FFV chips. They were suddenly replaced with E-85 FFV chips. Look into the recent past where Methanex was involved in lawsuit action with the largest ethanol producers in the USA and you’ll begin to gather some additional information.
There is something quite near and coming round the corner in this same industry which you and J.Q. Public [including the Chinese] are not really aware of. And this is a GTL catalytic process which produces MeOH and then begins combining C1 simple MeOH alcohols into synthetic, ultra-low low-cost, 24×7 continuous, C2 ethanol, C3 propanol, C4 butanol, C5 pentanol and up to C10 normal (n) linear decanol. And all of these synthetic alcohols in a blend produced by GTL methods are simple and biodegradable (stronger BTU, stronger octane) alcohols.
The same GTL process where methanol has been produced for the past 95 years can now be used to produce a blend of higher mixed alcohols featuring 138 octane and over 90,000 BTU’s at twice the production efficiency wherein C1 MeOH at 108 octane and 56,000 BTU’s is presently produced.
The new blend of synthetic higher mixed alcohols can be seamlessly mixed with all flavors of petroleum-derived hydrocarbon liquid fuels and also with ground coal. This new and stronger fuel alcohol formulation functions to provide mileage increases with a decrease in portions of the emissions sprectrum over 50%. And this new fuel alcohol blend can be produced for less than 50¢ per gallon in commercial facilities of 15,000 bpd (212 mgpy) and larger.
The carbonaceous feedstocks herein are anything with carbon content to include methane, CO2, coal of any rank, garbage, sewer sludge, beetle-killed pine, waste petroleum-coke and ground tires. Imagine the solid wastes of society being cleanly converted in a gasifier without any smokestack. What would the NIMBY’s think?
I think about new energy industry to be constructed globally along with decentralized ownership of something new and exceedingly profitable without subsidy of any kind. A near-term result would be brown urban smog being lowered by 50% and even municipal ownership with citizens participating with equity in new fuel production facilities which are seamless to the existing fuel pool. Think about Cleaned Coal™ beneficiation for old coal-fired powerplants as well. Oh, I almost forgot. Offshore fuel alcohol production from floating Plantships gobbling up waste flare gas from offshore oil platforms. More to come.
You’ve written about new and biodegradable fuel movements in China – something dear to my heart. Thank you for publishing your research.