Hey, Look Me Over. Lend Me Your Ears is a good introduction to this morning’s blog. It’s a hit song from the Broadway show Wildcat. Now, how many of you remember Wildcat? One, two……Good show! I am going to change the lyrics. You can keep your ears. I just want your eyes, and only for a few minutes. I am going to ask you to read and think about the following direct quotes from recent articles and studies about natural gas and methanol. Let me know how you feel or better think.
From the NY Times, Sunday
Speaking of natural gas, Floyd Norris in last week’s NY Times (June 21, 2012) indicated that this fuel is cheap and plentiful. But there is little infrastructure to deliver it to users, and so there is little demand for equipment to use it. Norris goes on to argue for a job creating, government support program for fuel stations, so drivers using natural gas, or presumably, its derivative methanol, can fill’er up. Over a Barrel will leave it to others, for now, to debate the wisdom of his proposed initiative. But our readers should know that the lack of infrastructure is, in part, related to restrictive regulations, and in part because oil producer/distributors, who hold tight reigns on gas stations, refuse to add flex fuel capacity. Monopolistic conditions in place currently generate big profits and limit consumer choices.
From The Street, Monday
Robert Weinstein, financial guru, suggests in an article in the June 25 issue of The Street that long-term energy prices should continue to fall. More important, natural gas prices are so incredibly low, that even with falling oil prices, natural gas is still an exceptionally attractive alternative. Over a Barrel notes that if oil falls near 50 dollars a barrel, projections of tight oil production will probably need to be revised downward as drilling costs will outweigh profits. Over a Barrel, with some fear and trepidation, given Weinstein’s reputation, also worries that his optimism, while welcome, may be somewhat overdone. Yes, oil prices will likely continue to fall. But the decline to 65 dollars or lower (if it occurs at all) may well be short lived. The high cost of getting tight oil out of shale or deep water, combined with a return to a healthier world economy and continued tension in the middle east, will likely place a floor on the price of oil and cause it to escalate higher over time. No firm predictions, but if you own oil stock, don’t sell it, just yet!
From The Hamilton Project
Chrsitopher R. Knittel Professor of Energy Economics MIT authored a paper called Leveling the Playing Field for Natural Gas in Transportation for the Hamilton Project. It was published by the Brookings Institute this month. Knittel’s indicates that increased use of methanol is consistent with the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA). It is a domestic source for transportation fuel. It diversifies our transportation fuel sources and in doing so decreases the negative impact of oil price shocks on the U.S. economy. Kittel, referring to studies by other experts, notes that the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of methanol, made from natural gas, are more than 11 percent lower than gasoline. He argues for subsidies for natural gas vehicles commensurate with the reduction in external costs (externalities) associated with their use. Over a Barrel is not yet ready to comment on specific strategies to even out the playing field with regard to subsidies. It requires a bit more thinking. Paraphrasing, with some freedom, my tutor on oil (you know that guy from Greece – Socrates), an unexamined subsidy may not be worth having. Let’s wait for a future blog for commentary.



I really like this installment Marshall
.
interesting points
thanks….Lets continue the dialogue.
American Energy Independence
Marshall, this is a very good review, and I would not have read those articles/papers if you hadn’t told us about them and included the links. Thanks!
Thanks. I appreciate your response. I wish we could relate fuel alternatives re. choice readily to the American public and foster a meaningfjul dialogue…not 30 second commericals. The campaign has not yet-neither candidate-rised to the occasion
The solution will be Electrical Cars
Hi Marshall
IMHO, once battery technology makes a big step forward, electric cars will become practical and affordable; Then, the demand for gas will significantly drop and price will down spiral.
Good for the Jews.
Boaz
I suspect natural gas might be a transitional fuel…but that transition could be a relatively long time. Batteries are now to heavy, to costly and secure too little in terms of mileage with out a charge. I hope there is a breakthru but most experts think its at least ten years away. Meanwhile natural gas and its derivitive methanol would be a viable fuel..cheaper , cleaner. Boaz the world will be better of if we open up th oil market to competition re. transportation. When batteries can compete, great… but they cannot now…Chevy’s volt has sold in the US only 12,000 cars…Nisson also comes up shot. Lets choose consumer choice. Saying all this…I hope your well. Miss you guys>
request for your current email adress
Hi Marshall — Roberto Moreno and I are co-editing a book on “Using the Narcotrafico Crisis to Build Public Administration Capacity in the US and Mexico.” We have an English language contract with Taylor & Francis, and are working on a Spanish language contract with Miguel Angel Porrua in Mexico City. Many of our prospective authors were participants in the Binational Consortium for PA Education that you created. It would be an honor to have you write a brief prologue. Email me so we can discuss. Hope you’re doing well, thanks!
don, nice hearing from you . would love too. Let me know how and when…be well
Since the big company’s gave our jobs over seas, they now have a higher demand for fuel than we do, so we pay that cost extra. The oil companies do not care who they sell too.
Thank
Michael wagner